Democrats Fiddle While Rome Burns
Thursday, August 28th, 2008I could not resist chuckling when I read the August 14 letter, “For Smart Energy Solutions, We Need a Democratic Senate”. Judging from what we have already endured from the Democratic House, voting for more of the same in our Senate would rapidly make us a third world country.
For starters, in a textbook example of “fiddling while Rome burns”, our Congressional representatives decided that staying in session during August to resolve a national energy crisis was just not as much fun as vacationing. As a consequence, the nation is still in an energy quagmire, literally paralyzed until the congressional prima donnas decide to start doing their jobs again.
Then, there’s the inexplicable energy bill that the Democratic Congress passed last December which allowed wind and solar energy investment tax credits to expire, resulting in an economic blow to the alternative fuel industry. If developing alternative energy sources is such a high priority, the Democratic majority must be keeping it a major secret. One has to question the wisdom and honesty of a political stance which deliberately sabatoges a key policy.
Despite decrying the evils of fossil fuels, but with a nod to their corn-producing constituents, the Democratic “thoughtful leadership” in Congress enacted incentives for corn ethanol whose production requires large quantities of fossil fuel, water and land resources. The race for corn ethanol has resulted in a steep increase in world food prices and a near zero impact on energy prices. The same Washington Worthies then voted to tax imported cane sugar ethanol, which is cheaper than corn and uses significantly less fossil fuel, water and land to produce. Could they be more interested in protecting the interests of Big Corn than in reducing fuel or food prices?
And let’s not forget about the refusal of the current Congress to allow debate on offshore drilling, effectively muzzling even their own party members who may want to explore this option. Regardless of one’s position on offshore drilling, we send people to Congress so they will at least discuss and debate issues and thereby distill a course of action. Is preventing debate on an urgent issue an example of the “honest and thoughtful leadership in Washington” that a Democratic Senate would bring?
Finally, there’s the issue of off-shore drilling itself, where our friends in Congress claim that drilling won’t have any positive impact on oil market prices. Despite the fact that nearly every notable economist, members of their own party and most of the public advocates drilling as part of a comprehensive policy, the Democratic majority chooses to stick their fingers in their ears. They seem to ignore the fact that nearly 18 billion gallons of available oil sits off our coast and that the exploration, platform construction, drilling, production, refining and distribution of petroleum products would bring high-paying jobs to Americans. Meanwhile, the Chinese (who apparently didn’t get the word that offshore drilling is economically useless) are busy erecting oil platforms and drilling out the oil off the Florida coast. Too bad that oil and those jobs can’t go to Americans.
Yes, we certainly do need some honest, thoughtful leadership in Washington.
Julia Schappals is a member of the Bedford Republican Committee.